Blog Layout

June 2014

Jul 08, 2014

Why you still need a credit shelter trust

Some married couples may be thinking that, with estate tax exemption portability between spouses now permanent, they no longer need credit shelter trusts. But for many well-to-do couples, that’s not the case: Credit shelter trusts can offer substantial benefits that exemption portability doesn’t.

Leveraging exemptions

Before exemption portability, the primary purpose of credit shelter trusts was to ensure that a married couple could take maximum advantage of both members’ estate tax exemptions without having to transfer significant amounts of assets to their children (or other beneficiaries) on the first spouse’s death. Instead, assets of the first spouse to die — up to the exemption amount — would be transferred (tax-free under the marital deduction) to a credit shelter trust benefiting the surviving spouse.

The trust would distribute its income (and in certain limited circumstances, some principal) to the surviving spouse for life. Upon the survivor’s death, the trust assets would pass tax-free to the children under the first spouse’s estate tax exemption — leaving the survivor’s exemption available to transfer some or all of his or her own assets tax-free.

Since 2010, exemption portability has allowed a surviving spouse to use any of his or her deceased spouse’s unused estate tax exemption — provided an election is made on a properly filed estate tax return. This means that all of the assets of the first spouse to die can be transferred directly to the surviving spouse without sacrificing the first spouse’s exemption. So a credit shelter trust isn’t necessary simply to preserve that exemption.

However, a credit shelter trust can still allow a couple to transfer more assets tax-free. How? The estate tax exemption protection applies not just to the dollar amount that’s initially transferred to the trust, but to any future growth in the trust as well.

For example, let’s say you have $5 million of exemption available at your death, and a credit shelter trust is funded with that amount. Now let’s imagine that your spouse dies 10 years later, and by that time the trust has grown to $7.5 million. The entire $7.5 million can pass tax-free to your children — without using up any of your spouse’s exemption.

Other benefits

 

While the ability to leverage your exemption may be the biggest benefit of a credit shelter trust post-portability, it does offer other advantages over portability as well, such as creditor protection, generation-skipping transfer tax planning opportunities and preservation of state exemptions. So even with portability available, you may still need a credit shelter trust to achieve your estate planning goals. 

 

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: