Blog Layout

Tax Tips | What if you can’t pay your taxes on time?

Nov 30, 2020

What if you can’t pay your taxes on time?

If you’re unable to pay your tax bill by April 15, you have several options, but doing nothing isn’t one of them. At the very least, you should file your return to avoid failure to file penalties of 5% of your tax liability per month, up to a maximum of 25%. You’ll still owe failure to pay penalties, which accrue at 0.5% per month, up to a maximum of 25%, but you may be able to get an “undue hardship” extension of 18 months (or possibly longer). In that case, you’ll avoid penalties, though you’ll have to pay interest.

Another option is to request an installment payment agreement, which includes interest and reduced penalties. Or you could borrow money from a relative or friend. Bank loans may also be a possibility, but often the interest and fees exceed what you’d pay under an installment agreement.

Annual exclusion gifts: Don’t underestimate their power

The federal gift and estate tax exemption is a whopping $11.7 million for 2021, so for many people estate planning may not seem all that important. But consider this: The exemption is scheduled to be cut in half at the end of 2025, and there’s talk in Congress about reducing it even earlier, to as little as $3.5 million. Even if you’re not ready for complex estate planning strategies, annual exclusion gifts can be a simple yet powerful tool for reducing your potential transfer tax liability.

You’re permitted to give up to $15,000 to any number of recipients each year, without using any of your exemption amount. If you split gifts with your spouse, that amount doubles to $30,000 per recipient. Say you and your spouse have three children, all of whom are married. You can make annual exclusion gifts of $30,000 per year to each child and each spouse, for a total of $180,000. In five years, you’ll have transferred $900,000 out of your estate tax-free, while preserving your lifetime exemption.

New guidance on business meals and entertainment

In 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the deduction for business expenses related to entertainment, amusement or recreation (with a few exceptions). Business expenses for food and beverages remain deductible (generally up to 50% of qualifying expenditures). Recently, the IRS finalized regulations that explain the disallowance of entertainment expenses and provide guidance on determining whether an activity is considered entertainment and, if so, whether it falls under one of the exceptions. The regulations also provide guidance on the deduction of expenses for food and beverages, the application of the 50% limit, and the exceptions to that limit.

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: