Blog Layout

TaxTactics July 2015

Jul 09, 2015

Tax Tips

Investors: Have your cake and eat it too

A good tax-planning technique is to sell a poor-performing security to “harvest” the loss and offset it against your capital gains. But what if you have high hopes for the security and would like to keep it in your portfolio? One strategy is to sell it at a loss and then buy it back at roughly the same price.

Just be sure to mind the “wash sale rule,” which prohibits you from taking a loss on a security if you buy a substantially identical security within 30 days before or after you sell the original security. The simplest way to comply is to sell the security, wait 31 days and repurchase the same security — provided you’re willing to assume the risk that the price will go up during that time.

One way to hedge your bets is to double your holdings of the security, wait 31 days and then sell the original securities. Or you can sell the securities and immediately buy securities that are similar but not substantially identical.

If you violate the wash sale rule, you won’t lose the loss permanently. You’ll just have to wait until you sell the replacement security before you can recognize it.

ABLE plan can assist disabled family members

If a family member is disabled, check with your home state to see if it will offer an ABLE (“achieving a better life experience”) plan. Created by last year’s tax extenders legislation, the ABLE plan is modeled after the Section 529 college savings plan. Added to the tax code as Sec. 529A, the ABLE plan allows qualifying disabled individuals to set aside funds (up to $100,000 or more) for certain expenses — including housing, transportation, health care and education — without affecting their eligibility for federal and state government aid. Distributions used for qualifying expenses are tax-free.

Are you eligible for the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit?

This refundable, two-year credit — up to 50% of premiums (35% for nonprofits) — is available to employers that 1) have fewer than 25 full-time-equivalent employees (FTEs); 2) pay average annual wages of less than $51,600 (for 2015); and 3) pay a uniform percentage for all employees of at least 50% of premium costs. To qualify for the credit, an employer must purchase coverage through an exchange that’s part of the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace.

Note: The full credit is available to employers with 10 or fewer FTEs and average annual wages of $25,800 or less (for 2015). The credit begins to phase out once those thresholds are reached.

© 2015

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: