Blog Layout

Business As We See It May 2015

May 04, 2015

Watch Out!

There are New Rules Regarding Excepted Benefits

Does your company offer dental, vision, long-term care or employee assistance plans? If it does, pay attention to new regulations jointly issued by the IRS, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Health and Human Services. The new rules should make these plans more attractive to both employers and employees.

Limited excepted benefits

The regs address limited excepted benefits, which are separate from employers’ group health plans. These benefits often include limited-scope dental and vision plans, as well as benefits for long-term care, nursing home care and home health care.

The “excepted” status is key, because excepted benefits aren’t subject to some of the portability and nondiscrimination requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Affordable Care Act. In addition, employees who are eligible to participate in excepted plans aren’t precluded from receiving tax credits for their insurance premiums if they obtain health care coverage through a health insurance exchange.

The change

Before the rules were enacted, employers had to collect contributions from participants before their limited-scope vision or dental plans or their long-term care benefits could qualify as excepted. However, as the agencies stated, “In some cases, the cost of collecting the nominal contribution would be greater than the contribution itself.”

The agencies removed the requirement that plan participants pay an additional premium or contribution before limited benefit plans could qualify as excepted. The IRS also said limited-scope vision or dental benefits don’t have to be offered in connection with a major medical or primary group health plan to be considered excepted.

In addition, the new rules establish four criteria under which employee assistance plans (EAPs) can be considered as excepted benefit plans. First, EAPs can’t provide significant health care benefits. “Significant” is determined by the amount, scope and duration of the benefits offered. For instance, an EAP that provides disease management services for individuals with chronic conditions likely wouldn’t qualify as an excepted benefit plan.

In addition, an EAP’s benefits can’t be coordinated with the benefits available under another group health plan, and employees can’t be required to provide contributions or pay premiums to participate in the EAP. Finally, the EAP can’t impose any cost-sharing requirements.

Are you ready?

The new rules kick in for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2015, so make sure you contact your benefits advisor. He or she can offer additional insight on excepted benefits and the impact of these rules.

© 2014

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
By Sarah Rose Stack 01 Apr, 2024
During the COVID-19 pandemic, business travel nearly came to a halt. Today, it’s on the rebound, as “Zoom-fatigued” executives craving face-to-face interaction hit the road again. With more people getting out of their offices, now is a good time for a refresher on the tax deductibility of business travel expenses. This article explores what’s considered one’s tax home and what expenses are deductible. A sidebar explains the deductibility rules when a business trip is mixed with pleasure.
Show More
Share by: