Blog Layout

Business As We See It October (A) 2017

Sep 19, 2017

Get to Know Required Minimum Distributions

The oldest members of the Baby Boomer generation — Americans born between 1946 and 1964, according to the U.S. Census — turned 70 in 2016. This means that, in 2017, many will need to start taking required minimum distributions (RMDs — RMDs also are known as minimum required distributions, or MRDs) from their retirement accounts.

The government requires owners of many retirement accounts to take RMDs by April 1 of the year after they turn 70½. For subsequent years, the RMD must be taken by December 31. This means an account owner that defers the RMD to the year after turning 70½ will have two required distributions that year — one by April 1, and one by December 31.

RMD regulations apply to most owners of IRA, SEP IRA and SIMPLE IRA retirement plans, as well as to many owners of employer-sponsored retirement plans, such as profit-sharing and 401(k) plans. The use of RMDs limits the chance that money will sit in these accounts — untaxed — indefinitely.

The RMD calculation typically starts with the adjusted market value of the retirement account as of the end of the preceding year. The account owner divides this by a life expectancy factor set by the IRS and published in one of the following tables:

  1. The Uniform Lifetime Table . This is used unless the spouse is the sole beneficiary and he or she is more than 10 years younger than the account owner.
  2. The Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy Table . This is used when the sole beneficiary is a spouse who’s more than 10 years younger than the account owner.
  3. The Single Life Expectancy Table . This is used with inherited IRAs.

What if an individual has several retirement accounts? The rules vary a bit, depending on the type of account. Individuals who own several IRAs must calculate the RMD for each account, but can withdraw the total amount from a single IRA. Owners of most defined contribution accounts typically will need to calculate and withdraw the RMD from each account. (The rules differ for 403(b) accounts.)

With Roth IRAs, RMDs aren’t required until the owner passes away. Owners of many defined contribution plans, such as 401(k) plans, who work past age 70½ can delay their RMDs until they’re retired, if the plan allows and they don’t own 5% or more of the business that sponsors the plan.

Owners of retirement accounts who fail to take the appropriate RMDs can face penalties of 50% of the amount that wasn’t withdrawn, but should have been.

© 2017

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: