Blog Layout

Healthy Perspectives: Spring 2016

Apr 05, 2016

Payer Contracts

How to drive a hard bargain

Practices often allow their payer contracts to renew automatically each year without re-examining the terms. But the practice may have changed and added new providers, new services, or a larger patient panel, and perhaps gained an enhanced bargaining position. If so, you may need to make changes to the contract.

Review terms and documentation

First, you need to understand all of the practice’s contracts, individually and comparatively. Prepare a table or matrix displaying the payers, their contact information and key provisions such as:

  • Termination requirements,
  • Reimbursement history,
  • Claims filing deadline, and
  • Minimum response time to proposed amendments.

Look carefully at which contracts are better than others. The differences can point to opportunities for positive changes in suboptimal arrangements.

Get out your calculator

There’s a critical calculation to make before initiating negotiations with a payer. Start by ascertaining the fixed overhead of the practice. Then, convert the most common services into relative value units (RVUs) using the Medicare and Medicaid rates.

Next, divide the RVUs into the overhead costs. The result is the volume of service the practice must provide to cover its fixed overhead. Analyze each payer contract to see what reimbursement levels they pay, and the volumes of service they generate for the practice. If the two in combination don’t equal or exceed the overhead, renegotiate the contract.

Negotiate methodically and patiently

To begin negotiations, submit to the payer a detailed request for the desired changes. Don’t treat the process casually — send it through the appropriate channels by a means that requires signatures and allows tracking.

In addition, be sure to have supporting documentation for any changes being sought. Demonstrate exactly how they’ll benefit patients, your practice and the payer itself. Wherever possible, offer performance data, financial projections, benchmark figures, patient surveys, and comparisons with other practices and markets.

Keep in mind that it’s easier to renegotiate a contract before you sign a new contract or renew an old one. You’ll be in a weaker position if you try to change a contract mid-term. Also, remember that the negotiation process will involve a certain amount of give and take. The process can be time-consuming. If your practice doesn’t have the time or resources to engage in it, you may wish to bring in an outside consultant.

Manage for optimum effect

Payer contracts are one of a practice’s most important assets. Analyze yours carefully and manage them for optimum effect. In the event you can’t agree on financially practical terms with a payer, be prepared to drop it and find a better one.

© 2016

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: