Blog Layout

Spring 2013

May 29, 2013

How to Avoid Medicare Penalties in 2013

2013 is going to be a big year for physicians with regard to reporting Medicare quality measures and participating in e-prescribing and EHR incentive programs. All three programs have been voluntary — until now. Eventually, Medicare payments to physicians will be reduced if they don’t participate in the programs. And Medicare officials will use doctors’ performance in 2013 as a benchmark for future penalties.

E-prescribing is essential

Medicare’s Electronic Prescribing Incentive Program uses a combination of incentive payments and payment adjustments to encourage e-prescribing by eligible professionals. It requires doctors to attach code G8553 to Medicare claims that use an e-prescribing system. In addition to sending prescriptions electronically, the system must be able to generate an active medication list, as well as information on formulary medications; lower cost, therapeutically equivalent drugs; and patient eligibility requirements.

Doctors who fail to sufficiently use e-prescribing will see a 2% reduction in their Medicare Part B payments in 2014. To avoid that penalty, your practice must indicate (through its claims) that it has employed e-prescribing in at least 10 patient encounters between Jan. 1, 2013, and June 30, 2013. Physicians who earned e-prescribing bonuses in 2012 are exempt from the penalty.

Demonstrating “meaningful use”

Physicians can earn up to $44,000 from Medicare or $63,750 from Medicaid (one or the other, not both) by demonstrating their adoption and meaningful use of an EHR system. Medicare eligible professionals must initiate a qualifying EHR system by Oct. 1, 2014. Doctors adopting EHR technology for the first time must operate under the first stage of meaningful use rules for two years before moving on to the second stage. The sooner a practice gets started, the better. Those who have already achieved meaningful use need not move on to the next stage until 2014.

Beginning in 2015, eligible professionals who haven’t successfully demonstrated meaningful use will be subject to a payment adjustment. The payment reduction starts at 1% and increases each year that meaningful use is not  evident, up to a maximum of 5%.

The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) is a Medicare program that uses a combination of incentive payments and payment adjustments to promote reporting of quality information by eligible professionals. Incentive payments are made to doctors who satisfactorily report data on quality measures related to Part B services they have provided. Beginning in 2015, the program applies a payment adjustment to eligible professionals who don’t satisfactorily report data on quality measures for covered professional services.

To participate in PQRS, doctors must report information from their practices on specified individual quality measures or measures groups (based on major diseases such as diabetes and osteoporosis). There are four ways these reports can be made:

  1. To CMS on their Medicare Part B claims,
  2. To a qualified Physician Quality Reporting registry,
  3. To CMS via a qualified EHR system, or
  4. To a qualified PQRS data submission vendor.

Physicians who report quality measures satisfactorily receive a bonus of 0.5% of all their Medicare Part B charges. Those who fail to report successfully in 2013 will incur a penalty of 1.5% of their 2015 reimbursement rates. Moreover, the reduction in physician payments will grow to 2% in 2016 and subsequent years.

Practices of 100 or more physicians that fail to make PQRS reports in 2013 will receive a 1% penalty in 2015 under Medicare’s value-based payment modifier program. The program is designed to pay more to groups that provide higher-quality, lower-cost care. CMS plans to extend this program to smaller groups and solo practitioners over the next few years.

Interesting years ahead

This year and for several years to come, most physician practices will be challenged as they implement these changes. That’s why it’s critical that physicians tap into the knowledge of their legal and financial advisors closely. •

This material is generic in nature. Before relying on the material in any important matter, users should note date of publication and carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness, and relevance for their purposes, and should obtain any appropriate professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances.

Share Post:

By Sarah Rose Stack 22 Apr, 2024
Cost allocation can be a cumbersome task for nonprofits, especially organizations with many activities. However, the process is critical for multiple reasons, and it’s worth reviewing cost allocation practices regularly to ensure they’re working as intended. This article covers the reasons to make allocations and the various methods used.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
President Biden signed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) 2.0 Act into law in late 2022, but much of the wide-reaching retirement legislation is being phased in over time. There are some significant changes in 2024 and 2025 that may help nonprofit employers recruit and retain employees. This article presents what organizations need to know. A brief sidebar looks at how SECURE 2.0 boosts the advantages of qualified charitable distributions (QCDs), possibly leading to larger gifts for nonprofits.
By Sarah Rose Stack 15 Apr, 2024
The tax code allows an individual to claim a deduction for business debts that have become worthless. But qualifying for the deduction may be more complicated than one would think. In a recent case, the IRS denied more than $17 million in bad debt deductions on the grounds that the advances in question represented equity rather than debt, hitting the taxpayer with millions of dollars in taxes and penalties. This article recounts the U.S. Tax Court case Allen v. Commissioner. Allen v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2023-86).
Show More
Share by: